2 Corrected typo, other improvements
source | link

Differences betwenbetween HTML templating systems

I'm looking at backbone.js and noticed that it supports various templating systems (they specifically refer to Mustache.js, Haml-js, and Eco, but I understand it can support even more)(like Pure and dust.js)

My question is really whyWhy are there so many of these? What makes one better or different to the others? Can anyone shed light on what their individual strengths and weaknesses are.?

Differences betwen HTML templating systems

I'm looking at backbone.js and noticed that it supports various templating systems (they specifically refer to Mustache.js, Haml-js, and Eco, but I understand it can support even more)(like Pure and dust.js)

My question is really why are there so many of these? What makes one better or different to the others? Can anyone shed light on what their individual strengths and weaknesses are.

Differences between HTML templating systems

I'm looking at backbone.js and noticed that it supports various templating systems (they specifically refer to Mustache.js, Haml-js, and Eco, but I understand it can support even more)(like Pure and dust.js)

Why are there so many of these? What makes one better or different to the others? Can anyone shed light on what their individual strengths and weaknesses are?

1
source | link

Differences betwen HTML templating systems

I'm looking at backbone.js and noticed that it supports various templating systems (they specifically refer to Mustache.js, Haml-js, and Eco, but I understand it can support even more)(like Pure and dust.js)

My question is really why are there so many of these? What makes one better or different to the others? Can anyone shed light on what their individual strengths and weaknesses are.