4 added 172 characters in body
source | link

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics. For the first part, if you are developing a professional product, I guess you already have a standard procedure. For the letter, there are books, courses, and lots of other material available at the web.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills, at least some basic skills from that field. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. Probably your testers don't have to be as good as your users in the domain, but some knowledge of the domain will be essential. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics. For the first part, if you are developing a professional product, I guess you already have a standard procedure. For the letter, there are books, courses, and lots of other material available at the web.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics. For the first part, if you are developing a professional product, I guess you already have a standard procedure. For the letter, there are books, courses, and lots of other material available at the web.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills, at least some basic skills from that field. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. Probably your testers don't have to be as good as your users in the domain, but some knowledge of the domain will be essential. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

3 added 232 characters in body
source | link

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics. For the first part, if you are developing a professional product, I guess you already have a standard procedure. For the letter, there are books, courses, and lots of other material available at the web.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics. For the first part, if you are developing a professional product, I guess you already have a standard procedure. For the letter, there are books, courses, and lots of other material available at the web.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

2 added 232 characters in body
source | link

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics.

Your testers do not need to think like a developer - for black-box testing they need to think like a user of your software, and they should have additional knowledge about how to test software in general. So assumed your testers are smart enough to learn those things in a reasonable amount of time, train testers the same way you train your users, and make them learn testing basics.

And if the usage of your software needs a fully skilled engineer, you will need your testers to have equal skills. For example, when you develop a CAD software, you need people trained in technical drawing, if they are users or if they are testers. But maybe you could see this also as a chance to improve your software in a way to lower the entry skill level?

1
source | link