2 Copy edited.
source | link

Flawless? They're not. I recently installed some "updates", and it was months (and several reprogrammed sections of code) later before my ASP.NET site was working properly again, due to unexplained changes in how various basic things worked or failed.

However, they are tested and then used by many very smart detail-oriented people, who tend to notice and report and fix most things. Stack Exchange is a great example (and improvement on) how all the people using those tools help test and analyze how these amazingly complex and low-level tools work, at least as far as as practical use goes.

But flawless, no. Although you can also see on StackExchange people on Stack Exchange gaining impressive insight into performance details and standards compliance and quirks, there are always flaws and imperfections, especially when different people have different opinions of what a flaw is.

Flawless? They're not. I recently installed some "updates" and it was months (and several reprogrammed sections of code) later before my ASP.NET site was working properly again, due to unexplained changes in how various basic things worked or failed.

However, they are tested and then used by many very smart detail-oriented people, who tend to notice and report and fix most things. Stack Exchange is a great example (and improvement on) how all the people using those tools help test and analyze how these amazingly complex and low-level tools work, at least as far as as practical use goes.

But flawless, no. Although you can also see on StackExchange people gaining impressive insight into performance details and standards compliance and quirks, there are always flaws and imperfections, especially when different people have different opinions of what a flaw is.

Flawless? They're not. I recently installed some "updates", and it was months (and several reprogrammed sections of code) later before my ASP.NET site was working properly again, due to unexplained changes in how various basic things worked or failed.

However, they are tested and then used by many very smart detail-oriented people, who tend to notice and report and fix most things. Stack Exchange is a great example (and improvement on) how all the people using those tools help test and analyze how these amazingly complex and low-level tools work, at least as far as as practical use goes.

But flawless, no. Although you can also see people on Stack Exchange gaining impressive insight into performance details and standards compliance and quirks, there are always flaws and imperfections, especially when different people have different opinions of what a flaw is.

1
source | link

Flawless? They're not. I recently installed some "updates" and it was months (and several reprogrammed sections of code) later before my ASP.NET site was working properly again, due to unexplained changes in how various basic things worked or failed.

However, they are tested and then used by many very smart detail-oriented people, who tend to notice and report and fix most things. Stack Exchange is a great example (and improvement on) how all the people using those tools help test and analyze how these amazingly complex and low-level tools work, at least as far as as practical use goes.

But flawless, no. Although you can also see on StackExchange people gaining impressive insight into performance details and standards compliance and quirks, there are always flaws and imperfections, especially when different people have different opinions of what a flaw is.