Timeline for Review before or after code commit, which is better?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 19, 2016 at 19:12 | comment | added | Tobias B. | The model has been verified with real world data to some (very limited) degree. The main problem is that for a large share of the input factors, we did not have values that were measured in a real world project. The main verification was done by presenting the model to several practitioners. Two of them (one with a background in pre and one for post) reviewed it in more detail. If we had better quantitative data available, we probably wouldn't have built a model at all, but just analyzed the data. | |
Jun 9, 2016 at 10:31 | review | Late answers | |||
Jun 9, 2016 at 11:22 | |||||
Jun 9, 2016 at 10:16 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 9, 2016 at 10:16 | |||||
S Jun 9, 2016 at 10:11 | history | answered | Tobias B. | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
S Jun 9, 2016 at 10:11 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Tobias B. |