Skip to main content
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the related work space when you are done with the site. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620What version control system can manage all aspects?

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the related work space when you are done with the site. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the related work space when you are done with the site. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: What version control system can manage all aspects?

added 22 characters in body
Source Link
BillThor
  • 6.3k
  • 18
  • 17

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the related work space when you are done with the site. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the work space when you are done. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the related work space when you are done with the site. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620

Source Link
BillThor
  • 6.3k
  • 18
  • 17

I would quit using a shared drive for shared editing. Go with a proper version control system and personal work spaces. Shared work spaces lead to all sort of issues including lost changes.

There is no reason to have all the sites checked out all the time. Checkout the sites you need and remove the work space when you are done. Your work flows will need to change accordingly.

I'll avoid repeating a lengthy answer. This question is similar to: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/120613/what-version-control-system-can-manage-all-aspects/120620#120620