Timeline for At what point is brevity no longer a virtue?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2019 at 23:41 | comment | added | gnasher729 | Much less readable. The variable name is horrible (BothCostsAreValid would be better. There is nothing here about products). But even that doesn't add anything to the readability, because just checking CostIn, CostOut is fine. You'd introduce an extra variable with a meaningful name if the meaning of the expression that is being tested is not obvious. | |
| Jan 10, 2017 at 20:37 | comment | added | Miles Rout |
That's silly. if (CostIn <= 0 || CostOut <= 0) is completely fine.
|
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 17:05 | comment | added | danny117 | Your on the right track. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 16:06 | comment | added | Hagen von Eitzen | Of course, costs can be zero (think Xmas presents). And in times of negative interest rates negative costs should not be too surprising either and at least the code should be prepared to deal with it (and be it by throwing errors) | |
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 21:38 | history | suggested | Captain Man | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Remove chattiness and add in-line code formatting
|
| Jan 5, 2017 at 20:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 21:38 | |||||
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 18:07 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Change git style markdown to SE style markdown
|
| Jan 5, 2017 at 17:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 5, 2017 at 18:07 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2017 at 17:19 | history | answered | user949300 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |