Timeline for Make sense out of automatic information gathered from legacy system
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 at 19:45 | vote | accept | Pablo Santa Cruz | ||
| Nov 27, 2017 at 19:13 | comment | added | Doc Brown | Honestly, though your overall answer is fine, I heavily disagree that DFD represent a "procedural view" of the world. Quite the opposite, they show a view which maps much better to functional and event driven programming than to OO and procedural thinking. And I guess the real reason DFD were introduced way too late into UML again (as information flow) are political and trademark reasons, or maybe because of the "Not Invented Here" phenomenon. | |
| Nov 27, 2017 at 19:09 | history | edited | Christophe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 497 characters in body
|
| Nov 27, 2017 at 18:44 | history | answered | Christophe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |