Post Closed as "not constructive" by gnat, Bart van Ingen Schenau, Kilian Foth, Yusubov, Dynamic
8 edited tags
| link
7 deleted 160 characters in body; edited tags
source | link

Why would you hire in-house over outsourcing in developing a product for your company? I can only think of a few but I'm not entirely sure if they're good enough reason.

This is actually for a debate that I'm going to have in class. I'm more inclined on the outsourcing part but unfortunately, I was asked to switch to the in-house side of the debate.

Any ideas?

UPDATE

Thanks for the answers guys. The debate went well because of them. I'm pretty sure our side won the debate because of the points presented here.

Why would you hire in-house over outsourcing in developing a product for your company? I can only think of a few but I'm not entirely sure if they're good enough reason.

This is actually for a debate that I'm going to have in class. I'm more inclined on the outsourcing part but unfortunately, I was asked to switch to the in-house side of the debate.

Any ideas?

UPDATE

Thanks for the answers guys. The debate went well because of them. I'm pretty sure our side won the debate because of the points presented here.

Why would you hire in-house over outsourcing in developing a product for your company? I can only think of a few but I'm not entirely sure if they're good enough reason.

This is actually for a debate that I'm going to have in class. I'm more inclined on the outsourcing part but unfortunately, I was asked to switch to the in-house side of the debate.

Any ideas?

6 edited tags
| link
5 edited tags
| link
4 Added update
source | link
3 Re-tagged the question
| link
2 Changed the title
| link
1
source | link