3 grammer
source | link

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project needs that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee, it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developerdevelopers to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader anand follow. It is the project that matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project needs that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developer to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader an follow. It the project matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project needs that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee, it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developers to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader and follow. It is the project that matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

2 grammer
source | link

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project needneeds that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developer to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDITEDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader an follow. It the project matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project need that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developer to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader an follow. It the project matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project needs that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developer to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader an follow. It the project matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !

1
source | link

If I could choose I would have 6-7 seniors on a team ( assuming the project need that many ).

The only time I can see this being a problem is if the seniors are only senior in self perception and not work ethic.

There is nothing better than working with a group of people who appreciate that every piece of software development is important - the documentation, the planning, the code, the coffee it all matters and it takes mature ( real senior ) developer to be "above nothing" and get the job done properly.

EDIT: Many other answers have said that too many leaders is a problem - but why is there a perception that a senior must lead? A senior should be mature enough to pick a leader an follow. It the project matters - pick / get a role and rock it silly !