3 edited body
source | link

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using interpreted languages (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others) because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the moremost popular compiled languages.

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one interpreted language for flexibility). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using interpreted languages (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others) because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the more popular compiled languages.

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one interpreted language for flexibility). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using interpreted languages (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others) because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the most popular compiled languages.

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one interpreted language for flexibility). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

2 added 25 characters in body
source | link

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using dynamicinterpreted languages (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others) because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the more popular compiled languages. (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others)

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one dynamicinterpreted language for flexibility). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using dynamic languages because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the more popular compiled languages. (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others)

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one dynamic language). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using interpreted languages (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others) because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the more popular compiled languages.

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one interpreted language for flexibility). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.

1
source | link

Almost all non-really-high-performance websites are written using dynamic languages because they are much much easier to modify, update, setup and run than the more popular compiled languages. (PHP, C#/.Net, Java, Python, Ruby, and others)

That said, Google.com, Amazon.com, Facebook.com are built over compiled languages (C++, maybe with some C, certainly combined with one dynamic language). The first two "might" have been under historical choices (there were no clear alternative at the time) but the conversion from PHP to C++ of Facebook.com (HipHop) does proves that using a compiled language can make the difference in performance/resources.

Still you have to have very good reasons to use compiled code for websites as they are less easy to modify. An example an C++ framework that clearly states why it is done and when it should be used is CPPCMS. Here is the rationale, that explains clearly why you should try compiled languages in some specific cases. Main reasons : (high-)performance and use less resources than in alternatives.