Timeline for Too much version control and bug tracking overhead per change?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
40 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 at 20:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 24, 2018 at 3:05 | |||||
| Jul 19, 2011 at 16:38 | comment | added | Jon7 | @Sean McMillan It's very possible that they say that, but in reality, they just require that a company write up a standards document. They aren't going to check every project at a company with tens of thousands of employees. | |
| Jul 19, 2011 at 16:32 | comment | added | Sean McMillan | @Jon7: I thought CMMI 4 and 5 required IT-wide and organization-wide standards. | |
| Jul 19, 2011 at 15:29 | answer | added | Steven Evers | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Jul 19, 2011 at 15:27 | answer | added | jkerian | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Jul 19, 2011 at 15:27 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by jkerian | ||
| Jul 15, 2011 at 15:11 | answer | added | Ian | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 15:05 | comment | added | Ian | @edA-qa, I would hope a nuclear power plan would only have one active version of the control software and very few changes once it had gone live. | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 5:58 | comment | added | kevin cline | I think this process would be fine except that branching in CVS is rather expensive. | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 3:27 | answer | added | Jonathan Cline IEEE | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 14, 2011 at 17:10 | comment | added | liori | Is the "To fix a single bug, first I obtain a clean, new virtual machine. Then I create a branch for that single bug fix, based on another branch described in the Bugzilla report. I install the branch on the machine, set that up." part automated? If not, why? | |
| Jul 14, 2011 at 13:18 | answer | added | Aaronaught | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jul 14, 2011 at 6:34 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 14, 2011 at 3:58 | comment | added | user8 | This question is now being discussed on our meta-discussion site. | |
| Jul 14, 2011 at 0:53 | comment | added | PeterL | Is this method effective at keeping things organized and reducing regressions and other similar problems? If it's effective and management understands that you won't be able to work quickly, then to me it seems more like a valid management decision that is just hard for most programmers to work with. They're sacrificing speed and flexibility in an attempt to remove as much risk as possible. If it's ineffective or they expect you to produce as fast as an agile team, then there's a serious problem. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 20:27 | answer | added | gnat | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 19:00 | answer | added | kindall | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 17:54 | answer | added | karthiks | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 17:01 | comment | added | Jon7 | @artjom To get a high CMMI level, a company just needs to have 1 team that obtains that level. The rest of the company could be like the wild west and it doesn't effect the CMMI level. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 16:32 | answer | added | Andreas Bonini | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 16:10 | comment | added | Job | Large companies can afford to be schizophrenic, but not for long, unless they have friends in the government. This would bother me. if this bothers you, then move. Or, just do your 9-5 to keep all of the benefits and just learn to build web sites on the side. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 16:02 | comment | added | TrojanName | Joel Spolsky answered this question 10 years ago! Big Macs vs. The Naked Chef | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 16:00 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made it a little more rant-less
|
| Jul 13, 2011 at 15:29 | answer | added | Matt Joiner | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 12:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/91123153396432897 | ||
| Jul 13, 2011 at 12:32 | comment | added | edA-qa mort-ora-y | If the software was the control system for a nuclear power plant this doesn't seem unreasonable. If for a Facebook fan page it seems extremely excessive. Without the context it is hard to say if this unreasonable or not: there are certainly projects for which it isn't, and others where it certainly is. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 12:29 | comment | added | Rei Miyasaka | Is this a question or a blog post? | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 12:24 | history | edited | Ponk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2011 at 12:12 | answer | added | vartec | timeline score: 8 | |
| S Jul 13, 2011 at 11:59 | history | suggested | pyvi |
added tag 'workflow'
|
|
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:48 | comment | added | vines | And since the supervisors encourage constant distractions, your job must be a real hell... | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39 | comment | added | user1249 | Sounds like the organization has been badly bitten earlier and have grown defenses. Perhaps you should ask about the history of this? | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:29 | answer | added | SF. | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:28 | comment | added | artjom | Feel bad for you :( Does company where your are working has CMMI 3 and higher ? | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:26 | answer | added | Joonas Pulakka | timeline score: 87 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:26 | answer | added | Steve Rukuts | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:25 | answer | added | Homde | timeline score: 20 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 13, 2011 at 11:59 | |||||
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:23 | answer | added | Xavier T. | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 11:14 | history | asked | Ponk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |