43

I noticed to my glee that C++11 has a std::sto@ family of functions for easily unpacking ints/floats/longs whatever from strings. I'm surprised however, that the opposite isn't implemented. Why didn't the standards committee include a std::itos family of functions for going from ints/floats/whatever (back) to strings?

1 Answer 1

45

I was mistaken, there is a set of "Xtos" functions, they are all just named to_string. Each to_string is overloaded to take a different basic type, i.e.:

std::string to_string(float f);
std::string to_string(int f);
...

See here for more info.

3
  • 10
    Which leaves the question why the stoX functions were named such awkwardly instead of providing a matching generic from_string<T> specialized for each arithmetic type T.
    – 5gon12eder
    Commented Mar 9, 2016 at 1:59
  • 1
    Probably following on from C Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 22:37
  • 6
    to_string is not the exact opposite of stoi, bacause in stoi() you can specify base, but in to_string() you cant :/ Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 3:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.