I am sorry if this question isn't appropriate here, but this made me confused.
But what I read in MPL 2.0, any software derivated from a existing one with this license should keep it under such license.
Then my question is:
- Is the PirateBrowser violating mozilla's license since there is no indication of the source anywhere?
- What could a user do to enforce such license ? (i.e request the source-code)