2

How can C++ make it possible to use dynamic container classes even in embedded systems?

Background info:

I've been working with PIC (C) and AVR (C++) processors and at the moment (PIC C) I'm trying to send a text (with undefined length) to a method that only sends this string with a HTTP POST (so it has to know the length beforehand).

Problem & question:

On C++ this could easily be achieved with a container class/dynamic array. Though, when using C, I (guess) I'm continiously overwriting memory addresses (When I use a pointer and then change the length)?

How does C++ (efficiëntly?) manage dynamic arrays? Are all bits off the dynamic array scattered throughout your memory and how does it find these back? Or does it secretly allocate memory/blocks of memory?

| improve this question | |
  • 2
    Why do you say "even in embedded systems"? I don't see what that would have to do with anything, unless you don't have access to malloc/realloc or their C++ equivalents. – Doval Apr 7 '15 at 14:22
  • 1
    Hmm, I wasn't quite sure if the architecture of the device would change anything, thought it'd be good to add. – Paul Apr 7 '15 at 14:28
6

C++ can do it the same way C does. All C++ gives you is easier-to-use containers that wrap much of the low-level detail.

For example, a string class can (and does) hold a block of memory on the stack for short strings, only allocating a heap buffer for larger ones. This buffer is exactly like a C string buffer, if the string resizes, the string class will resize it in the same way a C programmer would by allocating a new buffer and copying the old data into it, except that possibly the string class will over-allocate the buffer size to allow for future appending to the string. Some string classes will count the length of the string using strlen, others will store the length as a member variable that it keeps up to date.

Arrays are managed in the same way, but there are specialised containers that give you things like linked lists.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    So basically in C++ there are functions that re-locate your memory runtime? – Paul Apr 7 '15 at 14:22
  • 1
    @FuaZe Yes, but C has functions for that too. – Doval Apr 7 '15 at 14:31
  • 2
    @Doval I see, but I mean that a C++ string will do this automatically and within C the bound checking/reloallocating is up to you? – Paul Apr 7 '15 at 14:47
  • 1
    @FuaZe Someone had to write the code in the C++ string implementation to do bound checking and reallocating. Other than syntactic sugar for operators like + and automatic conversions from char * to string, there's no magic going on. – Doval Apr 7 '15 at 16:06
  • Thanks for the extra nuancuation! It sometimes looks like Magic though, no, to be honest I was thinking hoe it was implemented also. Didn't think of simply reallocating, haven't done that much runtime allocating (or well I did so, withouth knowing in C++). Was thinking they might have saved the locations of pieces of storage somewhere. Or pointer to the next piece, but that differs per implementation. Reallocating seems fair, but I know start to see the overhead of soms C++ functions – Paul Apr 7 '15 at 16:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.