3

I'm writing this small utility, FOSS but not intended for wide deployment, packaging in OS distributions etc. My utility depends on several libraries - some are header-only (it's C++), some are headers+compiled libraries.

Now, when it's a library with proper versioned released then life's simple. I have CMake look for that library, detect the version number, require an appropriate number and I'm set. I also do not bother to include a copy of that library with my own code in the revision control repository.

But what if the library I'm depending on is just a github project, with developers occasionally committing to it, and no release or versioning? How should I depend on that library and formalize this dependence? Should I include a snapshot of it? Assume it exists elsewhere, look for it and try to determine the changeset code or timestamp?

Note:

This question is not about my specific development environment, but you can use it to illustrate or if your suggestion is specific to it. I write (mostly) C++, use mercurial for revision control and CMake as the build system.

2
  • 1
    I suspect that the autoconf tool/configure will enable you to write small programs and automate checking that you can use the interface. Commented Sep 1, 2016 at 11:57
  • I would never ever rely on others when it comes to proper archiving and versioning. Thus we typically make a snapshot, even for libs where the producer claims he does proper versioning. Disk space is cheap.
    – Doc Brown
    Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 13:33

1 Answer 1

1

I don't have a silver bullet. You need to consider the amount of code in the github project, as well as whether you may assume that access to github will be no problem for your users (git is available, internet connection is available, etc).

If you decide to avoid including a snapshot of the third-party code, here is a reference explaining how you can download a certain state of a github repo. I am not familiar with CMake, so I don't know how you can implement those steps using CMake.

I would not suggest implementing automated discovery or identification of third-party source code, because it will be sensitive to changes that are out of your control and may easily become a weak chain in your build process.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.