Software Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I'd like to use the MIT License for a project I'm working on. Most of the files in the repository are mine but 1 had to be copied from another open-source project (also under the MIT License).
What should I do to indicate that the copyright notice in the license excludes certain files that I did not write?
You have several options:
1) The most robust solution is to explicitly state the copyright license in every file. It can be a single line at the top:
// Copyright (c) 2016 Your Name. Licensed under the MIT license (see LICENSE.txt).
This removes any doubt about the licensing and copyright of any given file.
For the third-party software, do the same (but pointing to separate LICENSE-FOO.txt file), or just include the entire license text in a comment blurb at the top.
2) Alternatively, you can add this line to the top of your LICENSE.txt:
Except where otherwise stated, this code is:
and then add a blurb stating otherwise to the third-party software files (as in option 1).
3) Finally, due to the wording of the MIT license, you can actually merge the licenses of multiple MIT licensed works into a single MIT license with multiple Copyright statements:
Copyright (c) 2016 Foo
Copyright (c) 2016 Bar
Permission is hereby granted, etc.
Just make sure to preserve the original Copyright statement(s) verbatim, and make sure that the rest of the two MIT licenses texts are actually identical word-for-word (unfortunately, people sometimes "tweak" the text, meaning the "MIT license" is not longer actually the real MIT license).
While legal, this can be confusing, since it's not clear which files originated from which author.
