We have three layers in our application. Service layer to provide an external API. BO layer for our business logic, and a DAO layer for our database connection.

Let's say every time we update a File, we also want to change something in the Folder, for example 'last modified date'. This needs to be done in a transaction. Either it succeeds and both File and Folder are edited. Or there's a failure and the transaction gets rolled back so both objects are in the previous state.

The "Edit a folder when a file get edited"-action is purely business logic. So this would mean it belongs in the BO-layer. However, we use Objectify for our Database, so to start a transaction we need to call ofy().transact(...). If we call this function in the BO layer, this breaks our design as there will be Database specific calls (Objectify) in our Business layer.

What would be a clean solution for this problem?

  • Can't FileBO call FolderBO.edit(newDate) because of the transaction problem ?
    – Spotted
    Oct 4, 2016 at 9:03
  • does java not have an equvilant of c# TransactionScope?
    – Ewan
    Oct 4, 2016 at 13:45
  • In Java, the transaction scope depends on the framework you use. In JEE it could be managed by the app server but usually is defined and managed declaratively vía Frameworks like Spring (vía annotations, xml, ...)
    – Laiv
    Oct 7, 2016 at 5:11
  • Worry less about trying to make different "layers" of your application functionally independent/ignorant of each other. Embrace the idea that your code is built for the architecture it supports and instead focus on making that code well-composed with respect to itself.
    – Ant P
    Apr 22, 2017 at 10:50

2 Answers 2


How you cut your transactions is indeed business logic. So let your DAO layer provide a db framework independent API for the transact method you mentioned (and probably for things like commit and rollback). Then you can use it from your BO layer without making it dependent from your database or your db framework.


Looks like Objectify is designed for atomic-like transactions (Google Application Engine Transactions). It will demand to you to develop your own abstraction of the Transaction Management.

In this case. the abstraction goes on How do I delegate the transaction management to upper layers?

@DocBrown approach looks the faster and cleaner solution for the given architecture (layered). It also seems the safest given the little info we have about the context.

I suggest checking out UnitOfWork design pattern for the business layer because it suits with the transaction management purposed by Objectify.

Briefly summarised, the pattern aims to encapsulate business operations as a whole (unit of work or business transaction). It contextualizes the changes that our business does in the state of the data.

Applied to the given architecture, would look like:

FileService -> FileBO : new EditFileTransaction().execute()
                           |-> ofy().transact(...)
                           |--> FileDAO.actionA()
                           |--> FolderDAO.actionA()
                           |-> [ofy().commit(...)|ofy().rollback()]

The example above assumes that FileDAO.actionA() and FolderDAO.actionA() make changes in the database, hence the ofy().transaction() at the beginning of the business transaction. Not modifying operations, as for example validations, may take place before beginning the transaction so in case of inconsistencies the business transaction (UoW) can be aborted safely.

  • What can I do if I have to check a business rule inside the transaction? Like if file size greater than 15mb abort transaction. May 9, 2020 at 16:55
  • The simplest implementation is, as u say, aborting the transaction. For example, you could rise a business exception. Within the UoW, you might decide not to begin the transaction until all the policies (file size constraint) are checked so that in case of aborting the unit of work, there's no need change to rollback in the data source.
    – Laiv
    May 19, 2020 at 9:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.