-2

As the open source world is fairly advanced now and you can find an open source implementation of pretty much everything, why are people/developers still using the obscure/proprietary libraries? In what case these are absolutely needed?

16

Three obvious reasons:

  1. There's no open source equivalent,
  2. The company wants paid-for support that they can rely on.
  3. They are a bit behind the times and do not yet trust open source libraries.
  • 5
    4. their customer mandates use of a particular tech – jk. Mar 1 '18 at 11:33
  • 13
    5. The only open source equivalent is GPL licensed and the company is unwilling to open up their own code. – Bart van Ingen Schenau Mar 1 '18 at 12:23
  • 8
    6. The choice was made in the past, long before anything remotely useful was available as open source, and it would be a risky, costly waste of time and resources to open up the application and link it to something different. – Martin Maat Mar 1 '18 at 13:48
  • 6
    7. The proprietary version is simply better – Sean Burton Mar 1 '18 at 14:42
  • And, if you to work for a company that is so large that other companies are formed just to figure out new ways to sue you, then you may run into push-back from your own legal department. Getting their approval to use open-source code might cost your team more than it costs to license a commercial version or even, to just write the ****ed thing from scratch. – Solomon Slow Mar 1 '18 at 15:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.