Burn down and burn up charts are used in agile projects to visualize the progress of a sprint. The same type of chart could also be applied to entire projects, not only to a single sprint. Thus they could be used in 'traditional' waterfall or v model projects as well, however I could not find evidence for that.

Is there a solid reason or is it just because I did not research well enough?


You are absolutely right. A burndown chart tracks the completion of an expected amount of work in a set amount of time (hence why it is often used for sprints) and burnup charts are more open-ended, so are frequently used in releases and projects. There is nothing stopping a waterfall project from using one. However you will encounter two problems:

1) Waterfall projects claim not to be open-ended. I don't want to make over-generalizations, but many waterfall projects that I have been a part of claim that they know when work will be done through the project. The burnup chart is useless if you know that because it is an open-ended tool. Using a burnup chart would be admitting that your projections are guesses at best and while many project managers would agree that this is true off-the-record, putting it down on paper is harder.

2) You can't burn anything up (or down) on these charts until it is completely done. That means all development, testing, audit, release, all done. Many waterfall projects are designed to have everything come together at the end, so you'd never update your chart until the very end. If you are simply marking off tasks (coding a feature is complete, designing an architecture is complete) then you actually subvert the mechanics of the chart.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.