2

OK, so I have been at this problem for the last few days, and I must admit - I am stuck.

I am trying to make a web application, where users can upload documents or send inbound e-mails.

Each document or email will be added to a stream. So a stream holds all the docs/mails.

Now, what I want to allow my users are the following:

  1. Users should be able to add ´fields´ to a stream. A field is essentially just a dynamic variable, that users can set. So for example, if a user uploads a large text file, they can eg. create below fields:
id | name
-----------------------
 1 | Order number
 2 | Tracking reference
  1. Users can then add parsing rules to each field. A parsing rule can consist of multiple methods. For example:

    • remove_empty_lines
    • text_replace
    • regex_text_replace

Users can apply as many parsing rules to the text string as they want. Everytime a new parsing rule has been applied, the new and updated text string will be stored in parsing_rule_results

OK so above describes the workflow, that a user can setup for each document/email, and above is bound pr. stream.

Now, what I want to achieve is the following:

  1. For each new document/email that is added to my application, I need to check what fields is defined for the specific stream.
  2. For each field defined, I need to run the string through each parsing_rule, and
  3. ultimately, once the string has been run through each parsing rule, the end result should be dynamically saved to that specific document/email. Something like:
id | document_id | email_id | field | data
---------------------------------------------------
 1 | 5           | null     | 3     | 5000251
 2 | 5           | null     | 4     | AJIWO4124124J
 3 | 6           | null     | 3     | 92841
 4 | 6           | null     | 4     | KKLJPEPQ9102
 5 | 6           | null     | 3     | E-Order2000
 6 | null        | 2        | 4     | OOCLTCU8291LK

Which can be translated into:

Stream: 1

Document ID # 5:

  1. order_number= "5000251"

  2. tracking_number = "AJIWO4124124J"

Document ID # 6:

  1. order_number= "92841"

  2. tracking_number = "KKLJPEPQ9102"

Email ID # 2:

  1. order_number= "E-Order2000"

  2. tracking_number = "OOCLTCU8291LK"

Below is the beginning of my database design - but without "field results".

My database setup

This is the code I have so far (models):

Stream.php

    // A stream can have many documents
    public function documents()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(Document::class);
    }

    //A stream can have many e-mails
    public function emails()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(Email::class);
    }
     //A stream can have many fields
    public function fields()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(Field::class);
    }
    //A stream have fields, which then have parsing rules.
    public function parsingRules()
    {
        return $this->hasManyThrough(ParsingRule::class, Field::class);
    }

Document.php

    //A document belongs to a Stream.
    public function stream()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(Stream::class);
    }

    // A document will have fields.
    public function fields()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(Field::class, 'stream_id', 'stream_id');
    }

Email.php

    // An email belongs to a Stream.
    public function stream()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(Stream::class);
    }

    //An email will have fields.
    public function fields()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(Field::class, 'stream_id', 'stream_id');
    }

Field.php

   // A field belongs to a Stream
    public function stream()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(Stream::class);
    }

    // A field can have many parsing rules.
    public function parsingRules()
    {
        return $this->hasMany(ParsingRule::class);
    }

ParsingRule.php

    //A parsing rule belongs to a field.
    public function field()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(Field::class);
    }

ParsingRuleResult.php

    //A parsing rule, belongs to a field rule.
    public function fieldrule()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(FieldRule::class);
    }

    // A parsing ruleresult, belongs to a document.
    public function document()
    {
        return $this->belongsTo(Document::class);
    }

I believe the real problem I have lies in my understanding of relationships, and how I should dynamically apply above logic.

Let's imagine I have a class, that will be called whenever a new document/email is being added:

ApplyParsingRules.php

    public function parse(Stream $stream, Document $document)
    {    
         $text = $document->text;
         $fields = $stream->fields()->get();


         //1. get all $parsing_rules for each $fields.

         //2. parse $text by using each $parsing_rule

         //3. save the end result of $text by document/email specific and field.

    }

As you can see, I can fetch the stream details as well as the fields for the specific stream.

However - how can I:

  1. Make it so it allows both Email and Document, depending on what is being added? (Above only allows Document)
  2. Run through each field, and subsequently parse through each parsing_rule and save the end result, so it's specific for each document/email

I hope above is somewhat clear. This post got a lot longer than first expected.

1
  • I believe, if you remove redundant and distracting code with relationships you already have in the diagram, it would be easier to read and understand. At first, I was confused, thought that you have 1 stream of data from which you would like to compose documents/emails. But the diagram helped. So, you want to upload a file, decompose it to an ordered list of fields (you call it a stream). Each file will be represented as one stream. After, you want to be able to compose a result from the stream. A result can be a type of Email or Document. => de/composing. Mar 26, 2019 at 18:31

1 Answer 1

1
+50

To allow the parse() function parse both Document and Email, you can create an interface, e.g. TextContainer that Document and Email implement. Something like:

interface TextContainer {
    function getText(): string;
    function setText(string $text);
    function save();
}

class ApplyParsingRules {

    public function parse(Stream $stream, TextContainer $container)
    {    
         $text = $container->getText();
         $fields = $stream->fields()->get();

         //1. get all $parsing_rules for each $fields.

         //2. parse $text by using each $parsing_rule

         //3. save the end result of $text by document/email specific and field.
         $container->setText($text);
         $container->save();
    }
}

I actually prefer parse() to return the result and let the caller decide what to do with the result, i.e.

class ApplyParsingRules {

    public function parse(Stream $stream, TextContainer $container): string
    {    
         $text = $container->getText();
         $fields = $stream->fields()->get();

         //1. get all $parsing_rules for each $fields.

         //2. parse $text by using each $parsing_rule

         return $text;
    }
}
10
  • Thanks for your comment. In regards to removing Documents and Emails table: I don't think I can place the text in the Streams table, since a stream can have many different documents/emails - all with different text content?
    – oliverbj
    Mar 24, 2019 at 18:49
  • Ah, I see. So, if a Streams can have many Documents and Emails then is it right that Fields belong to Documents? In that case you'd need Fields to have foreign key to Documents and Emails.
    – imel96
    Mar 24, 2019 at 23:33
  • I would argue that Fields belongs to a Stream, because the field values are the same for all Documents and Emails - i.e. they are not "bound" by a document or email. All documents and emails just needs to be parsed according to each field.
    – oliverbj
    Mar 25, 2019 at 7:16
  • @oliverbj I see, the database design is fine then. I updated my answer
    – imel96
    Mar 25, 2019 at 20:01
  • would Document and Email then contain getText, setText etc?
    – oliverbj
    Mar 25, 2019 at 20:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.