Software Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I have a Pose data type, consisting of x, y, and rotation values.
This being a robotics application, the Pose data type is used in about a dozen places throughout the application. Connecting all these up with dependencies makes the diagram very messy, is there a better solution?
If a class X has an attribute or parameter of type Pose, you don't need to draw a dependency from X to Pose. Using Pose in a feature of class X implies that class X depends on Pose.
Stop drawing connections just because you're supposed to draw connections.
In fact, stop drawing diagrams just because you're supposed to draw diagrams.
These things exist to help you communicate your design to other coders. Coders who are working in your domain and in your code base.
So please, even if you put Pose in 1000 classes don't draw a 1000 diagrams of it. I get the point already.
If that sounds crazy then explain why the String class doesn't show up in all of your diagrams.
Only show me the Pose class when you have something interesting to say about it. Otherwise get this noise away from me.
