Sevenseven's answer was an extremely good starting point, but I needed a few extra steps to get the full solution.
Get the pre merge history in Git (as a number of separate git repositories)
As in SVN they were separate repositories in SVN at that time it makes sense for them to be similarly in git
Determine the SVN revision that occurred just before the SVN repositories were merged (for the example we'll assume pre rearrange history of 1-100, rearranged at 101-105, post rearrange from 106
For each of the original svn repositories pull their changes
git svn clone http://svn/mergeTwoProjectsTest/project1 C:\projects\GitConversion/project1 --stdlayout --revision 1:100
git svn clone http://svn/mergeTwoProjectsTest/project2 C:\projects\GitConversion/project2 --stdlayout --revision 1:100
The folders will be empty this is fine. The import takes AGES and the next step is destructive, so I suggest taking a backup of these repos.
Add a subfolder to mirror what happen in SVN
When the histories of these are rearranged from 2 repos to 1 they will be within a subfolder in the single rearranged repo. So this subfolder can be added using filter-repo. This isn't part of core git and must be installed.
Open a command prompt within each of these repos and run the following command in each
git filter-repo --to-subdirectory-filter [SUB_PROJECT_NAME] --force
In my example [SUB_PROJECT_NAME] would be project1 in the first repo then project2 in the second repo. The important thing is to mirror whatever happened in SVN
Smoosh the repos together
In git terminology what you are doing is merging forks with unrelated history, in SVN you were rearranging several separate repositories into just one big one.
Next create a new (third) repository, name it whatever your overall project is called followed by _preRearrange, I will call it overProject_preRearrange in this example.
Within overProject_preRearrange open a command prompt and add the 2 sub project repositories as remotes
git remote add [NAME_OF_SUB_PROJECT] [PATH_TO_SUBPROJECT]
git fetch [NAME_OF_SUB_PROJECT] --tags
For each branch check it out
git checkout -b [BRANCH_NAME] master
And then merge its composite parts into it
git merge --allow-unrelated-histories [SUB_PROJECT_NAME]/[BRANCH_NAME]
e.g.
git merge --allow-unrelated-histories project1/4.0.0
git merge --allow-unrelated-histories project2/4.0.0
At this point the term "preRearrange" may seem incorrect. But they contain the history of all the commits which happened preRearrange, even if the merging of the forks has happened
Get the post merge history in Git
This will be a shallow history, appearing to begin at the point the rearrangement happened, don't worry about that.
Pull the post rearrangement history from SVN
git svn clone http://svn/mergeTwoProjectsTest C:\projects\GitConversion\overProject_postRearrange --stdlayout
Graft the gap
By grafting these 2 repositories together you will get a continuous (if unusual) history.
Open a cmd window in the preRearrangement
Add the postRearrangement repository as a remote
git remote add postRearrangement [PATH_TO_POST_REARRANGEMENT]
git fetch postRearrangement
For each branch you want to stitch together (any that have changed since the rearrangement) determine the first commit in postRearrange after the rearrange was fully complete in that branch (i.e. the first normal commit). And the last commit in preRearrange (this will be one of our merges)
git checkout [BRANCH_TO_GRAFT]
git replace --graft [FIRST_NORMAL_COMMIT_IN_POST_REARRANGE] [LAST_COMMIT_IN_PRE_REARRANGE]
git merge postRearrangement/[BRANCH_TO_GRAFT]
e.g.
git checkout 4.0.0
git replace --graft f5581bf6706fabd442253ae3c8fb2a974a74170e d60e9d4faa3f7d2fab3d4314df4fc27d7e50d90a
git merge postRearrangement/4.0.0
The preRearrange repo is the one you want to ultimately keep.
Check its all good
At the end of this process you should have a continuous history (and a lot more git experience), you may want to do some sanity checking before declaring yourself done.
Look at the history of your grafted branches, they should look like this:

Equally you may wish to do a git blame on a file that was edited both before and after the rearrangement, it should show lines edited both before and after it
git merge <remote> <branch> --allow-unrelated-histories
? See: git-scm.com/docs/git-merge#Documentation/… for more info. It's not the cleanest approach, but it does do the trick and might be less risky from the standpoint of losing history. The merge will be ugly, but it will be a traditional merge.git svn clone
command--allow-unrelated-histories
and wade through the conflicts. This should be a one time thing if the files and directory structure are the same. File renames in either version control will be ugly conflicts, but other than that resolving conflicts shouldn't be too bad.