I'm tired of how luggish my developments PC is. It's Core2 Duo, 2GB RAM, Seagate ST3500320AS HDD - not the top model, but quite a decent one.

Typically I open several copies of Visual Studio 2008, lots of tabs in Firefox, Outlook, MSDN, plus the programs I debug are quite huge, plus whatever Windows thinks it can't live without so I end up with Task Manager showing something like 2,5 GB pagefile usage.

All the software above becomes luggish to such extent that it's really annoying. Something like I click on a menubar in Visual Studio - and instead of just opening the menu it works the harddisk for say 10 seconds.

I'd like to have some magic "don't make me think" solution - so that it is installed once and then the lugs disappear or at least decrease significantly. It should not be very expensive - something like the current price of a hybrid drive.

Will a hybrid drive magically help overcome my problem once and for all? Do you have experience using hybrid drives for similar purposes?

4 Answers 4


It sounds more to me like getting more RAM in your machine would be the best thing you can do.

  • Visual Studio is very fond of IntelliSense - so it contributes a lot to actual disk usage. I seriosly doubt RAM alone will help much.
    – sharptooth
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:06
  • 2
    His machine will benefit a little with more memory. Memory is very cheap and I will attach more 2GB, sure. But a HHDD or SSD will bring a huge gain on performance. Try it by yourself.
    – Maniero
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:31
  • @bigown Why is there not a separate answer from you?
    – sharptooth
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:43
  • I preferred upvote NimChimpsky and Simon P Stevens answers which are good ones to me.
    – Maniero
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:52
  • Opens several copies of VS2008, large solutions - 2G of RAM??? I agree, get to 4G+ first and then start looking at SSDs.
    – FinnNk
    Sep 26, 2010 at 19:45

Jeff talked about it on his blog just this week - Revisiting Solid State Hard Drives

His conclusion was yes, hybrid drives bring the benefits of both worlds, improved performance and decent size.

He points to a review that says:

"While the Momentus XT isn't quite as fast as an SSD, it's a significant improvement over the mechanical drives found in notebooks today"..."The impact of adding just a small amount of SLC NAND is tremendous."

Although the ultimate conclusion is that it's great for laptops where you are limited on space, but for a desktop you'd probably be better off getting a smaller SSD for your OS & swap partition and a regular mechanical drive for your data.

  • Yeap, I read that. He says he ordered them, but doesn't say anything about actual experience.
    – sharptooth
    Sep 17, 2010 at 7:48
  • @sharptooth: He links to a review. See edit. Sep 17, 2010 at 8:26

Best upgrade I ever did.

Edit Other than maxing out my ram.

  • What software do you typically run and what tasks do you typically solve? That's important - maybe your usecase is not relevant.
    – sharptooth
    Sep 17, 2010 at 10:24
  • 1
    booting up windows and ubuntu, accessing data stored on my hardrives. Sep 17, 2010 at 13:29
  • Almost any user does that. Anything dealing with several copies of a heavy development environment?
    – sharptooth
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:43
  • 1
    exactly. My point is its not relevant[what ide/software I use] if you store and access data to your local hardrive. You can be any type of user, you will see an improvement in responsiveness. Sep 17, 2010 at 13:57
  • 1
    All applications hitting mass storage have huge gains, specially OS. I recommend HHDD or SSD to all computer users.
    – Maniero
    Sep 17, 2010 at 13:58

More RAM and an x64 OS.


We have two systems with minor HW differences that should account for 10..20% of build speed, one running Vista x86, the other Windows 7 x64, the latter building twice as fast.

I've heard related advice before: using W2K / W2K3 instead of Windows 98 or XP, but didn't have a direct comparison.

My Tests:

VS 2008, W7 x64 system has a 4 core CPU with HT and 8GB RAM, building in 8 processes in parallel.

An SSD (OCZ Vertex 2) does not significantly improve build speed on repeated builds with Antivirus disabled.

                                  SSD          HDD
 1st after boot, AV on            17:14         25:16
 2nd after boot, AV on            16:56         20:59
 3rd after boot, AV on            16:50        
 4th/3rd after boot, AV off       13:07         14:57

(3rd line to test epeatability of results, the last line is the "stable" case where there's not much benefit anymore).

Memory seems not limiting: even in the more taxing release builds with full optimization, "in use" < 60%, most of the rest is on "Standby", i.e. probably used as cache.

I'm planning to run some more detailed tests, (different threads in parallel etc.)

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.