3

I think it would be a great idea if we had a regular expression search engine, but can it be done? It seems impossible since there's no feasible way of indexing such a huge amount of data properly and displaying results in the order of relevance from what I can think of.

I'm curious what the answer to this one would be.

8

It can be done, and it has been done: http://www.google.com/codesearch

I think it is useful here because this is in a specific domain where the users might be expected to understand regexes. I suspect in general the feature is not that useful to the vast majority of Google users so there is probably no commercial reason to do it.

|improve this answer|||||
  • This is great but the source code on codesearch is a very tiny fraction of the web pages indexed by Google. I suspect there are some limitations because the commercial reason argument isn't that strong (they do have a number of useful keywords like site, filetype, intitle, inurl etc.). I think the load on their servers would be too great for regex searches. – Valentin Brasso Apr 28 '11 at 10:48
  • 4
    If Google thought Regex would be useful to enough people they could scale. They scaled for instant answers, that was a huge effort. Search is worth billions of $, if regex gave them an advantage they would do it, but 99% of users have no idea what a regex is, so it is simply not worth the effort. – Steve Apr 28 '11 at 10:50
  • Google doesn't shy away from throwing hardware at a problem. – JeffO Apr 28 '11 at 12:04
  • 2
    Note that Google Code Search is being retired. – MetaEd Nov 8 '11 at 21:05
  • 2
    has been retired now! – Vaibhav Garg Feb 9 '12 at 11:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.