I know this is obviously not true for some games, minesweeper, card games, etc. But what about any game involving simulating the real world environment. Obviously these games have some form of a physics engineer powering the graphics.

For someone like me who personally did not enjoy physics but loves video games, do I have a chance at ever getting involved in the development cycle of a video game such as this while disliking physics?

  • 2
    Have you looked at gamedev.stackexchange.com ?
    – dwynne
    Sep 14, 2010 at 0:35
  • 3
    I loved games but disliked maths and didn't excel in physics. I am however a good programmer, and did well with the maths in my computer science degree (including a subject on 3d computer graphics). Why? Because in high school, maths/physics is taught without context. I couldn't convince my brain it was worth retaining all that stuff when I couldn't imagine what it could possibly be used for. In the real world, this isn't a problem, because you're using the maths/physics to solve an actual problem, so it won't be so difficult (if you're like me).
    – MGOwen
    Jan 20, 2011 at 3:56
  • 1
    @MGOwen I'm completely with you here, the exact same thing happend to me too :)
    – legends2k
    Dec 31, 2012 at 9:06
  • Math should be easy (it's just high school math that is required for game programming), have a look @ this gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/12299/…
    – legends2k
    Dec 31, 2012 at 9:07

2 Answers 2


There are many aspects to game programing and you don't need to be an expert at all of them. If you're on a bigger team you may not even be doing the core game programming but just network communication for example.

For core game programming I would think that above a sound physics understanding you would need a strong mathematical background. Having a strong mathematical background will allow you to do things like modelling transformations, clippings, keyframe animation, ray tracing, image processing, texture mapping, etc.

Having a strong physics background may help you with coming up with new computer graphics methods, but it is not required if you want to become a game programmer.


It's very rare to write a physics engine for a game anymore. Usually, a third party library, either free or commercial, is used instead. The same goes for other aspects of game engines, too. Rendering, sound, AI, animation, GUI, networking, etc. It's rare that anyone writes a game engine from scratch these days. Usually people buy them. If they do make them, they buy a bunch of middleware to do the difficult tasks.

There's lots of places to start learning game programming. If you want to just go "make a game" I'd suggest diving into Unity. Unity is a fantastic, very easy to use game engine that can be used to make just about anything. It even provides most of the features of commercial engines (especially the upcoming version 3).

If you want to learn more about the fundamentals of game programming, check out PyGame or XNA. They take away a lot of the tedium normally found in managing graphics, input, sound etc. They won't do physics for you (they are not engines, just APIs), but there's a lot of free, easy to use solutions.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.