Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 51295

QUESTIONS ABOUT LICENSING ARE OFF-TOPIC. You may ask questions about open source licensing on https://opensource.stackexchange.com. This tag is for asking about designing programs that interact with open source software.

2 votes
Accepted

Does using Creative Commons No-Derivatives license conflict with GitHub terms?

Generally, the term "forking" means taking some codebase and making a modified version of it. However, Github uses the term "forking" to mean "use of Github's fork feature", which simply creates an un …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
4 votes

Does a BSD-licensed project need a signed statement from each contributor?

BSD allows derived works that are not, as a whole, BSD-licensed. The danger here is that a new contributor (or, really, any contributor) could submit a code contribution and then later claim that his …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
2 votes
Accepted

License question regarding open-source project which may eventually contain a commercial com...

The principle behind this strategy is perfectly sound: GPL-licensed projects include BSD-licensed components all the time. Imagine each contributor published his or her contributions on a personal re …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
15 votes
Accepted

Do I have to make source code open, if I use GPLv2 licensed software to derive data

Since you're making a derivative work of GPL-licensed software, your combined work would need to be licensed under the GPL as a whole. However, if you don't want to distribute your work, you are in no …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
3 votes

Is it actually possible (practically) to sell Open Source software?

You assume that the recipient wants to give away your software. It's possible that your customer has a vested business interest in not sharing the software. For example, if you sell an open-source ind …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
10 votes

Including GPLv2 code in GPLv3 code

In your case, the particular software you are using is licensed under "GPLv2 or any later version," which can be included in GPLv3-licensed code. If the code you wanted to use were using GPLv2 only, t …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203
25 votes
Accepted

Why do I have to keep my open source software license in the root?

From the GPL FAQ (but the advice is applicable to all licenses): Why does the GPL require including a copy of the GPL with every copy of the program? Including a copy of the license with the work is …
apsillers's user avatar
  • 5,203