Timeline for Why do so many libraries have no/poor documentation? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 18, 2015 at 22:42 | history | closed |
gnat Scant Roger user53019 user40980 Dan Pichelman |
Needs more focus | |
| Dec 14, 2015 at 10:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 18, 2015 at 22:42 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2011 at 16:48 | vote | accept | Billy ONeal | ||
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:38 | answer | added | IAbstract | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:19 | answer | added | jalf | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 18:39 | comment | added | Bernard | I don't entirely agree with your view, especially your third point. Writing code isn't always easy. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 13:56 | comment | added | Cody Gray | Because writing good documentation is hard, so most developers solve that problem by just not doing it. Besides, everything seems obvious while you're in the middle of writing the code. "My library is so easy to use that it's self-documenting!" -- Yeah, right. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 13:19 | comment | added | Eric Wilson | Maybe because you and I have spent so little time writing documentation for open source libraries. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 12:37 | answer | added | Jim C | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 9:36 | answer | added | Pete Cordell | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 | answer | added | Jerry Coffin | timeline score: 21 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 8:12 | answer | added | Tom Squires | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 8:02 | history | asked | Billy ONeal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |