Timeline for Why C++ cannot adopt D's approach for its concept implementation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Sep 30, 2011 at 15:58 | vote | accept | jj1 | ||
| Sep 13, 2011 at 9:45 | answer | added | Jonathan M Davis | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 14:13 | history | edited | jj1 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Sep 12, 2011 at 13:34 | answer | added | DeadMG | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 13:28 | answer | added | Šimon Tóth | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 10:19 | comment | added | Daniel James | This doesn't answer the question, but if you haven't seen it, Doug Gregor's account of why concepts were rejected is worth a look. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/113187857698533376 | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:40 | answer | added | Matthieu M. | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:17 | comment | added | David Rodríguez - dribeas | @jj1: Can you provide a short explanation on D's approach for those of us that don't know the language? | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:01 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:01 | comment | added | jalf | They're different languages. C++ concepts have to describe C++ templates. Nothing in D does that. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:59 | answer | added | Emilio Garavaglia | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:50 | comment | added | Nicol Bolas | I agree with iammilind: it should be moved to Programmers. Though it would be nice if there was a bit less random boldface text needlessly emphasizing words that we don't need to have emphasized. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:50 | comment | added | Emilio Garavaglia | Agree with David. I see no reason to preemptively say "non constructive" before anyone can even try to construct something. with 0 answers, the "constructiveness" is 0/0 hence indeterminate. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:49 | comment | added | Sarfaraz Nawaz | @David: I voted for reopen (and then maybe, it can be moved to programmers site) | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:46 | comment | added | David Rodríguez - dribeas | I think that the question might not be written in the most constructive way, but that there is value on it. I would love someone explaining how D manages concepts, and be able to compare it with the two main approaches that the C++ committee took on concepts before they decided to postpone the feature altogether... If this is to be closed, then it should at the very least be moved to programmers | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:42 | comment | added | justin | +1 i would have been interested in reading the responses. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:38 | comment | added | iammilind | This question should have been migrated to programmers.se. (I voted for that, but 3 votes were for "not constructive"). | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 8:24 | history | asked | jj1 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |