Timeline for Is Ant still in the "mainstream" for Java builds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2011 at 17:56 | comment | added | gnat | @PéterTörök so true! :) The luxury of popular OSS projects is that there are a lot of expert guys around who "replace" doc writer. To me that was the case with Maven - there always have been some guru around whom I could ask about tricky things | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 17:20 | comment | added | Péter Török | Why, have you ever seen an open source project which had a decent tech writer? ;-) | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 16:36 | comment | added | gnat | @PéterTörök right Maven Reference is my first aid too. Somehow though most of the stuff that worries me happens to end in these dark undocumented corners. To be precise I find these corners more "dark" than "undocumented" - I mean I feel the knowledge is there but I fail to decipher it. I dunno maybe I am unlucky. Or maybe dumb. Or maybe Maven guys just lack a decent tech writer in their gang | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 16:13 | comment | added | Péter Török | Dunno, I found the Maven Reference quite decent. It is not perfect, and there are dark undocumented corners indeed, but still IMHO it is significantly better than the average. | |
| Nov 17, 2011 at 16:08 | history | answered | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |