Timeline for FizzBuzz - really?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 15:35 | history | edited | Rachel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I like that link. I use it to find that SO post :)
|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 15:34 | history | rollback | Rachel |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| S Feb 5, 2014 at 15:21 | history | edited | Andres F. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed dead link
|
| S Feb 5, 2014 at 15:21 | history | suggested | Almo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed dead link
|
| Feb 5, 2014 at 15:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 5, 2014 at 15:21 | |||||
| Sep 2, 2011 at 14:24 | comment | added | Rachel | @ironcode I went to school with someone who couldn't even begin to comprehend fizzbuzz... I'd be surprised if they could even write something that printed out 100 lines with the fizzbuzz values hardcoded. They graduated with honors. | |
| Sep 2, 2011 at 13:03 | comment | added | user3792 | Still, it seems horrifying that someone could not solve fizzbuzz out of college. If they cannot do that, what can they do? | |
| Nov 13, 2010 at 16:18 | comment | added | Macha | @Adam Crossland: 100% of statistics about statistics are made up on the spot too. | |
| Oct 29, 2010 at 18:13 | comment | added | Adam Crossland | I suspect that the figure 99% points to the truth (the recursive truth, no less) of the statement that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot. | |
| Oct 29, 2010 at 17:15 | history | answered | Rachel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |