Timeline for Is there something wrong with how we're doing version control?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2016 at 16:13 | history | edited | radarbob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use local version control
|
| Dec 22, 2016 at 16:06 | history | edited | radarbob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use local version control
|
| Jul 23, 2012 at 14:58 | comment | added | radarbob | "per file / per repo(sitory)" versioning. Yep. This is a fundamental differentiation of VC software. I've used both kinds - "country AND western" (+1 to whomever knows this reference). I like the "per repo" model more. | |
| Jul 18, 2012 at 13:24 | comment | added | sleske | Nitpick: "All code files have version numbers. These numbers increment automatically" Some VCS (e.g. Subversion, Git) have version IDs per repo instead of per file, and the version IDs are not necessarily numeric (Git). Of course the basic point still stands. | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 18:04 | history | answered | radarbob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |