Timeline for Empirical evidence for choice of programming paradigm to address a problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 17:29 | comment | added | NoChance | +1, "The second problem is that 50% of developers have below average programming talent." This sentence is a relief to me. It is better than many pills I tried :) | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 16:38 | comment | added | user4051 | "code quality is a very subjective thing" agreed - you have to be careful what you measure, and perception is an important factor. But perception, like many other things, is malleable too: look at the rise and fall and rise of functional programming to see that what people think of how they work is not directly related to how they work. I've also recently been re-reading TAOUP. Part of my motivation for this question is seeing in early literature solutions to problems that are current in software engineering. | |
| Aug 29, 2012 at 15:55 | history | answered | Karl Bielefeldt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |