Timeline for Are CK Metrics still considered useful? Is there an open source tool to help?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 8, 2021 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/1368894292626903044 | ||
Feb 22, 2016 at 18:28 | answer | added | Fuhrmanator | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 11, 2012 at 0:24 | vote | accept | DeveloperDon | ||
Oct 9, 2012 at 10:34 | answer | added | Michael Borgwardt | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 9, 2012 at 9:09 | answer | added | Boris Baldassari | timeline score: 6 | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 12:02 | comment | added | Daniel B | I haven't used CK metrics much, but I do make use of various other metrics (number of methods, cyclometic complexity, lines of code per class) to identify classes which are outside the norm in the project. These are often (but not always) ripe for refactoring, and you'd need to use your own judgement. I would definitely recommend this approach to others. | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 6:09 | comment | added | yannis | Well, it's not really easy to tell, some of the metrics are integrated into popular tools, along with a ton of other metrics, sometimes you might be using them and not even knowing ;) I know ndepend supports CK metrics for .Net projects, I'm sure other platforms have similar tools. | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 5:54 | comment | added | DeveloperDon | Thanks. I knew there were many follow up academic papers, many proposing additional metrics, some that analyzed large numbers of open source projects. Relative to your experience, are they paper tigers or do people use them? Are they tool supported? | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 5:38 | comment | added | yannis | Empirical Analysis of CK Metrics for Object-Oriented Design Complexity: Implications for Software Defects | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 5:29 | history | asked | DeveloperDon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |