Timeline for Is Perforce as good at merging as DVCSs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2015 at 7:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/598386794833534976 | ||
| Oct 17, 2012 at 23:55 | vote | accept | dukeofgaming | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 19:01 | comment | added | kayaker243 | yeah, i kind of look in awe at those people who used svn and still had positive things to say about it. even the folks that designed svn admit its data model is inferior. | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 11:45 | comment | added | Peter K. | I've had precisely the opposite experience to @PéterTörök. For me, Subversion merging has screwed up several times, but Perforce has not missed a beat. I suspect that (for both of us) it is more to do with the driver than the driven. :-) Having said that, I believe (subjectively) that git's merging is superior again. | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 11:40 | answer | added | James | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 7:31 | comment | added | Péter Török | I must say my experiences (regarding Perforce being good at merging) are the opposite. I saw Perforce completely screw up complex merges several times, while have had less trouble with Subversion. Of course, the experiences come from totally different projects so they aren't directly comparable. This is just my subjective memory. | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 4:10 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 12, 2012 at 3:43 | answer | added | kayaker243 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 3:23 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 16, 2012 at 9:46 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 2:35 | history | asked | dukeofgaming | CC BY-SA 3.0 |