Timeline for Why not Green Threads?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 at 14:09 | comment | added | Peter Paul | @Rick-777 doc.rust-lang.org/book/… this explains why Rust did not chose green threads. tl;dr, implementing green thread for itself will increase the compiled binary size, and Rust wants a small binary instead. | |
| Jan 29, 2017 at 17:29 | comment | added | Malcolm | @Rick-777 Rust is too low-level to do that. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 23:57 | comment | added | Rick-777 | Alas, Rust is another language that abandoned better concurrency abstractions. They too decided to move from co-operative threads to native threads. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 22:29 | comment | added | Dmytro | how far have we gone since the time you posted :O | |
| S Nov 21, 2012 at 20:34 | review | Late answers | |||
| Nov 21, 2012 at 20:40 | |||||
| S Nov 21, 2012 at 20:34 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 21, 2012 at 21:22 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2012 at 20:16 | history | answered | Rick-777 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |