Timeline for Why shouldn't I use the repository pattern with Entity Framework?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2021 at 10:00 | comment | added | JacquesB | Since the EF already implement the repository pattern, there is no clear benefit to add yet a repository abstraction on top. Probably they wanted to test if you understood the cost of adding unnecessary abstractions. | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 12:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Aug 11, 2019 at 12:42 | |||||
| Feb 21, 2018 at 22:08 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 26, 2018 at 3:01 | |||||
| S Feb 21, 2018 at 21:49 | history | suggested | ChW |
added entity framework tag
|
|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 19:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 21, 2018 at 21:49 | |||||
| Mar 23, 2017 at 12:55 | comment | added | Kiquenet |
NOT good idea (UnitOfWork + Repository) by Rob Conery rob.conery.io/2014/03/04/…
|
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 19:09 | comment | added | Richard Tingle | I expect this is a question trying to get you to think about the downsides of generally good things. Everything has downsides | |
| Jan 26, 2016 at 6:40 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Jan 26, 2016 at 4:49 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 2, 2016 at 3:03 | |||||
| Jan 21, 2016 at 10:16 | comment | added | ColacX | The repository pattern is outdated. And causes lots of problems. | |
| Dec 18, 2015 at 5:16 | answer | added | Thunder | timeline score: -6 | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 7:59 | history | unprotected | yannis | ||
| Oct 15, 2015 at 5:49 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Oct 15, 2015 at 2:40 | answer | added | Zawer Haroon | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 4, 2015 at 20:38 | answer | added | Mufasa | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 23:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/556225649091018753 | ||
| Feb 2, 2014 at 8:30 | comment | added | Jaime Sangcap | check ayende's blog ayende.com/blog. Base on what I know, he used to use Repository Pattern but eventually gave it up in favor of the Query Object Pattern | |
| Dec 3, 2013 at 2:23 | answer | added | Chris Pratt | timeline score: 547 | |
| Jun 20, 2013 at 15:41 | answer | added | James Culshaw | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 17:05 | answer | added | Russell Horwood | timeline score: 18 | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 18:43 | comment | added | Arseni Mourzenko | The funny fact is that searching for "repository pattern" in Google gives the results which are mostly related to Entity Framework and how to use the pattern with EF. | |
| Dec 31, 2012 at 18:17 | answer | added | luksan | timeline score: 47 | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 15:42 | comment | added | Bob Horn | So what was the interviewer's reason for it not being a good idea? | |
| Dec 28, 2012 at 17:12 | comment | added | Laurent Bourgault-Roy | I would probably have answered to the interviewer that Microsoft use the repository pattern very often while they demonstrate the entity framework :| . | |
| Dec 28, 2012 at 14:53 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Dec 15, 2012 at 12:21 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 12, 2012 at 21:34 | comment | added | Omu | it was a trick question | |
| Dec 12, 2012 at 21:02 | answer | added | Shyju | timeline score: 120 | |
| Dec 12, 2012 at 20:32 | answer | added | Splendor | timeline score: 15 | |
| Dec 12, 2012 at 19:50 | history | asked | StringBuilder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |