Timeline for How do objects fit into modern C++ (stl, policy-classes, functional) style?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 19:16 | vote | accept | kirill_igum | ||
| Mar 27, 2013 at 23:11 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 28, 2013 at 0:06 | |||||
| Mar 22, 2013 at 17:52 | answer | added | greyfade | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 17:08 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling cleanup
|
| Mar 22, 2013 at 16:39 | answer | added | Travis Parks | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 22, 2013 at 2:54 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 22, 2013 at 11:09 | |||||
| Mar 21, 2013 at 22:28 | comment | added | kirill_igum | i was coming from the definition on wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming -- objects are data and associated methods. i'm asking about fundamental guidelines of paradigms rather then specialized cases that not all practitioners use. | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 22:16 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | Your question is based on a false premise, which is that objects containing only data or only code are not, by definition, object-oriented, which is not true. The combining of code and data together in the same object is only one aspect of object-orientation, and even the most staunch advocates of OO sometimes separate their code and their data. | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 22:14 | history | edited | kirill_igum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 197 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2013 at 22:06 | history | asked | kirill_igum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |