Timeline for Developer name in the copyright notice of files contributed to open source project?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2023 at 5:32 | history | edited | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2023 at 5:23 | history | edited | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 513 characters in body
|
| Apr 2, 2013 at 5:17 | vote | accept | Cool_Coder | ||
| Mar 26, 2013 at 10:57 | history | edited | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 677 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 10:49 | comment | added | Stephen C | Regarding the copyright notice. 1) If he explicitly adds his name to the notice that also declares "this is LGPL", he would have great difficultly claiming that he hadn't published his additions as LGPL. 2) As I said, him adding or not adding his name does not affect the copyright status. | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 10:45 | comment | added | Stephen C | 1) Yes. 2) Yes. Or more precisely, make it a precondition of accepting his contributions. 3) That is up to Sam. But if he is not happy, you don't need to accept his contributions. | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 8:56 | comment | added | Cool_Coder | I want to use GNU LGPL as my license. So what you say regarding what is published, cannot be unpublished still valid for LGPL? So I should ask Sam to publish his code under the terms of LGPL. Regarding Copyright notice, I do not want to have all the glory by myself! Infact there is a button on the About Dialog which on clicking shows a list of Contributors. So will Sam be fine with that? | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 8:46 | history | edited | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 297 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 8:39 | history | edited | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 297 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 8:32 | history | answered | Stephen C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |