Return to Question

The computer scientist Peter Norvig argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice.

But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming.

These articles are in opposition. Is there scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?

The computer scientist Peter Norvig argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice.

But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming.

These articles are in opposition. Is there a scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?

The computer scientist Peter Norving argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice. But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming.

These articles are in opposition. Is there scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?

The computer scientist Peter Norvig argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice. 

But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming.

These articles are in opposition. Is there scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?

The computer scientist Peter Norving argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice. But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming. This articles are in opposition. Is there scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?

The computer scientist Peter Norving argued in his essay Teach Yourself To Program in 10 Years that you need about 10,000 hours of practice. But Jeff Atwood argued in his post How To Become a Better Programmer by Not Programming that he believes the only way to become a better programmer is by not programming.

These articles are in opposition. Is there scientific evidence to prove the Jeff Atwood approach?