Timeline for Why Big Data Needs To Be Functional?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 at 19:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 14, 2017 at 14:14 | |||||
| Dec 1, 2017 at 19:21 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Dec 1, 2017 at 17:51 | answer | added | LxsScarredCrest | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 19, 2016 at 16:36 | history | edited | Thomas Owens♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 19, 2014 at 20:21 | comment | added | mattnz | @SK-logic : Is 'Fad' another connection :). Not saying they are actually fads, but the hype around them is identical...... | |
| Dec 31, 2013 at 23:50 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 1, 2014 at 16:35 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 16:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/409356969225760768 | ||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 16:18 | comment | added | SK-logic | The connection between "big data" fad and FP is not that straightforward. In "Big data", a so called map-reduce approach is fashionable, which, in turn, had been somewhat inspired by the functional programming ethos. This is where similarity ends, I cannot see any further connection between these two worlds. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 16:08 | history | edited | user3047512 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 327 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2013 at 15:00 | answer | added | Shivan Dragon | timeline score: 14 | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 13:53 | answer | added | Michael Borgwardt | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 13:28 | comment | added | Zavior | Also notice that while testing on the JVM, just running the test once does not give in any way reliable results. You'd need to run the test case several times over so the JIT kicks in. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:46 | history | edited | amon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added syntax highlighting, put each function into separate code block
|
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:38 | comment | added | Giorgio | @user3047512: For example, Erlang uses the actor model and is for the most part functional. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:28 | comment | added | Doc Brown | I guess its simply because the map/reduce approach from hadoop is an idea from functional programming. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:27 | comment | added | Giorgio | As far as I know the actor model is quite close to functional programming. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:13 | comment | added | user3047512 | @Giorgio : There are different paradigms as Actor Modeling to get the best performance to parallelism. Don't think so ? | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:05 | comment | added | Giorgio | Functional programming makes it easier to parallelize your code, so even if a single operation may take more time to run in one thread, the overall performance can be better due to parallelism. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 12:04 | answer | added | Lorenz Meyer | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 11:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 13:43 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 11:40 | history | asked | user3047512 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |