Timeline for Why isn't there a python compiler to native machine code?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2016 at 17:22 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Feb 6, 2016 at 13:49 | answer | added | user214354 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 20:18 | answer | added | Snappy | timeline score: -4 | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 18:53 | vote | accept | user2986898 | ||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 17:51 | comment | added | user7043 | One can write Python-to-native compilers. They just aren't very interesting because they don't actually improve performance by any significant margin, unless they actually implement a language that looks like Python but is far more restricted. I previously explained elsewhere why. | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 17:17 | history | edited | Kilian Foth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 7, 2014 at 17:08 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 10, 2014 at 18:13 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 13:00 | comment | added | Doc Brown | Actually, by choosing IronPythong (ironpython.net) and compile the produced IL code by using "ngen" (msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/6t9t5wcf%28v=vs.110%29.aspx) there is a way to compile Python to native machine code. Not that I had tested that tool chain. | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 11:29 | comment | added | Claudio | C++ also have interpreters. And probably tons of other languages have both implementations. | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 11:03 | answer | added | Euphoric | timeline score: 40 | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 10:00 | comment | added | toasted_flakes | There is. Haskell can also behave as compiled or interpreted through GHCI | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 9:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 19:42 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 8:51 | history | asked | user2986898 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |