Timeline for GPL- How much source must be released?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 at 2:21 | vote | accept | Jess Smith | ||
| Sep 16, 2014 at 14:21 | audit | Close votes | |||
| Sep 17, 2014 at 2:28 | |||||
| Sep 8, 2014 at 23:59 | comment | added | user22815 | This is part of the reason why the GPL is called a viral license. | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 10:53 | answer | added | Dmitry Alexandrov | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 21:12 | vote | accept | Jess Smith | ||
| Sep 22, 2014 at 2:21 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2014 at 20:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/508717626982281217 | ||
| Sep 7, 2014 at 19:31 | answer | added | whatsisname | timeline score: -3 | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 19:28 | comment | added | whatsisname | @BasileStarynkevitch: we can think for ourselves here, you know. The FSF makes this very clear that linking a GPL software into any body of work requires the whole work to be licensed per the GPL. gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLInProprietarySystem | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 19:26 | comment | added | Basile Starynkevitch | And their lawyers probably will tell them to not use your GPL software. If you want to write a free software which helps Wolfram, use some more permissive license like MIT. | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 19:05 | comment | added | Basile Starynkevitch | They have to ask their lawyers. | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 18:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 7, 2014 at 22:29 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2014 at 18:30 | history | asked | Jess Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |