Timeline for How can attributes/annotations be illustrated on a UML class diagram?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2016 at 19:00 | vote | accept | Lea Hayes | ||
| Jan 5, 2016 at 16:27 | answer | added | Ramon Rivas | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 24, 2015 at 16:06 | comment | added | Thomas Owens♦ | That seems appropriate, but I'd have to have a better understanding of how .NET annotations work. | |
| Apr 24, 2015 at 15:25 | comment | added | Lea Hayes | @ThomasOwens The presence of a particular attribute provides a mapping between two class types which I thought might be useful to illustrate on the diagram. So far the best that I can come up with is to draw a dependency line with the attribute name on it. Perhaps that IS the right way? | |
| Apr 24, 2015 at 13:57 | comment | added | Thomas Owens♦ | Maybe I'm missing something, but is there a need to show this on the UML diagram? I'm not that familiar with .NET, but I've never had a need to show a Java annotation on a UML class diagram. | |
| Apr 24, 2015 at 13:51 | history | asked | Lea Hayes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |