Timeline for Should my sequential collection start at index 0 or index 1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2015 at 15:20 | history | edited | kdbanman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 6:08 | history | unprotected | gnat | ||
| Jul 11, 2015 at 4:01 | history | protected | gnat | ||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 18:22 | comment | added | Matthew Read | From a quick read it seems like there is no need to use indices as a matter of efficiency, so you could use some kind of Map to directly link channel IDs and channels without needing to think about arrays. I think this is what Rob is getting at, and I also agree with his solution if you do opt for using indices. | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 15:46 | answer | added | jmoreno | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 15:20 | vote | accept | kdbanman | ||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 14:06 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: 24 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 9:07 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 7:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/619411967376248832 | ||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 7:40 | answer | added | david | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 5:37 | vote | accept | kdbanman | ||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 15:20 | |||||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 5:30 | comment | added | kdbanman | @svick, that's a great point. I may allow channel access by different identifiers later, but the primary lingo of the clients really seems to be one indexed channel numbers. | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 2:35 | answer | added | 9000 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 1:53 | comment | added | svick | Do channels have to be identified by their position in the set? Can't you identify them by something else instead (e.g. frequency if those were TV channels)? | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 1:23 | answer | added | Dietr1ch | timeline score: 21 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 1:16 | answer | added | Telastyn | timeline score: 35 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 1:04 | comment | added | kdbanman | @gnat It's a good thing I'm alone in the office - bursts of laughter staring at the computer screen aren't usually good indicators of productivity! | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 0:57 | comment | added | gnat | "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration." — Stan Kelly-Bootle | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 0:57 | answer | added | Bernard | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 0:49 | history | asked | kdbanman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |