Timeline for Inject or not dependencies in a component based framework
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2015 at 3:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 5, 2015 at 8:45 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2015 at 20:38 | vote | accept | Rômulo.Edu | ||
| Aug 14, 2015 at 9:29 | answer | added | JDT | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 22:28 | comment | added | Francis Toth | Providing an example (code) of what you want to setup could help. In any case, the first solution seems a little bit too automagic. In order to inject your component, you will probably need a setter or a constructor. What happens if the user messes with it ? The second one seems clearer for the client. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 22:21 | comment | added | Frank Hileman | Yes, but a design can also provide this flexibility without dependency injection. Personally, I have gotten a bit tired of unnecessary dependency injection (i.e., it is always the same class used, and the flexibility is wasted). | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 20:45 | comment | added | Rômulo.Edu | Yes, because in that case it would be given a default component with basic functionality. But that would only happen if the developer wanted to use the standard components and not the modified / created by him . In this case it would be possible to provide this flexibility to the developer ? | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 20:38 | comment | added | Frank Hileman | based on your explanation of solution 1, it does not sound like the external developer has a chance to change the data type, or class, which is instantiated. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 20:36 | comment | added | Rômulo.Edu | @FrankHileman, all the components communication are done using interfaces, so I think that would be possible to dynamically change components as long as the new component respects the contract. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 20:25 | comment | added | Frank Hileman | I don't think solution 1 qualifies as dependency injection. You are doing it, but at the same time removing the advantages of dependency injection, which is to dynamically substitute a type into the system at run-time. Unless I misunderstood. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 20:12 | history | edited | Tulains Córdova | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| Aug 13, 2015 at 19:48 | history | asked | Rômulo.Edu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |