Timeline for Microservices and shared libraries
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 19, 2018 at 8:48 | vote | accept | blueFast | ||
Apr 18, 2016 at 5:16 | comment | added | blueFast | @8bittree: yes, option 3 is similar to option 2, but having the git server (the "central" remote) be the package distribution mechanism. On the one hand it is using git for something not ment to (dependency management), on the other hand it reduces the number of components (no need of private PyPi) | |
Apr 15, 2016 at 15:19 | comment | added | 8bittree | I agree that option 2 is the best, but option 3 with the submodules has much more in common with option 2 than option 1. | |
Apr 15, 2016 at 14:15 | history | edited | Tommy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 120 characters in body
|
Apr 15, 2016 at 14:04 | history | answered | Tommy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |