Timeline for Validating transaction codes with reference codes... Best way to encode the validation rules?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 6:32 | comment | added | Laiv | Have you considered another way to define (store) the tuple code-regex? May be via properties? XML? Are these tuples going to change often? If not, this would be an intermediate way. However you miss the flexibility that DB offers like to manage these tuples with no need to redeploy your server-side application. | |
| May 29, 2016 at 13:54 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2950/should-hi-thanks-taglines-and-salutations-be-removed-from-posts
|
| May 29, 2016 at 13:42 | answer | added | d1820 | timeline score: -1 | |
| May 29, 2016 at 1:12 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 0:49 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 17 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2016 at 23:25 | comment | added | Darien | Questions: (A) Do you mean that transaction-codes (and associated patterns) must be add-able at runtime? (B) Can someone change an existing pattern? (C) So, what happens to data already-entered that might no longer match? (D) How complex can these patterns be? Is it possible for someone to want constraints you cannot satisfy with a regex? | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 22:18 | answer | added | Mattias Åslund | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 28, 2016 at 22:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 28, 2016 at 23:01 | |||||
| Apr 28, 2016 at 22:02 | history | asked | coson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |