Timeline for a funky interleaved sorting problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 4, 2016 at 22:24 | history | edited | Dennis Krupenik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
provided a more detailed explanation for the code.
|
| S May 4, 2016 at 22:24 | history | suggested | masukomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
provided a more detailed explanation for the code.
|
| May 4, 2016 at 22:04 | vote | accept | masukomi | ||
| May 4, 2016 at 22:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 4, 2016 at 22:24 | |||||
| May 4, 2016 at 19:46 | comment | added | Dennis Krupenik | @gnat thank you for the input, I've tried to add a human-readable explanation of the code, as well as an extended version of it | |
| May 4, 2016 at 19:43 | history | edited | Dennis Krupenik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 37 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2016 at 16:06 | comment | added | gnat | Programmers is about conceptual questions and answers are expected to explain things. Throwing code dumps instead of explanation is like copying code from IDE to whiteboard: it may look familiar and even sometimes be understandable, but it feels weird... just weird. Whiteboard doesn't have compiler | |
| May 4, 2016 at 16:05 | history | edited | Dennis Krupenik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2016 at 15:39 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 4, 2016 at 16:13 | |||||
| May 4, 2016 at 15:28 | comment | added | Dennis Krupenik |
@masukomi so you'd want [nil, x] to go before [x, nil]?
|
|
| May 4, 2016 at 15:27 | review | First posts | |||
| May 4, 2016 at 16:07 | |||||
| May 4, 2016 at 15:26 | comment | added | masukomi |
yup, almost, but not quite [2, nil], [3, nil], [nil, 3] don't match the desired output
|
|
| May 4, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | Marnen Laibow-Koser | I thought of this too, but notice that it's not quite the sorted order that was requested. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 15:23 | history | answered | Dennis Krupenik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |