Skip to main content

Timeline for Poker split / side pots

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 8, 2020 at 20:38 history protected gnat
Jul 8, 2020 at 11:33 answer added andydavies timeline score: 0
Jul 1, 2018 at 19:20 comment added kevin cline Currently the universal rule in casinos is to award any odd chip to the eldest hand (first to act).
May 11, 2017 at 12:37 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/862647944675291136
Apr 30, 2017 at 12:18 vote accept paparazzo
Mar 24, 2017 at 14:26 answer added Kuba timeline score: 1
Mar 24, 2017 at 12:33 answer added Matteo Sperati timeline score: 3
Mar 13, 2017 at 20:32 comment added paparazzo @EdwardRusu Yes and no. Pretty sure the drive is good but the hard drive is dead. And it is Win 10 app that I don't have another Win 10 to run it on.
Mar 13, 2017 at 20:26 comment added Edward Rusu @Paparazzi, did this ever get solved? I'm running into the same problem with a project of mine.
May 5, 2016 at 18:31 answer added paparazzo timeline score: 1
May 5, 2016 at 17:18 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 5, 2016 at 17:09 comment added Robbie Dee @Paparazzi N.B. there are four rounds in hold 'em - pre-flop, post-flop, turn (4th street) and river (5th street).
May 5, 2016 at 17:04 comment added paparazzo I don't get the close based on debugging or writing existing code. There is no existing code for split pots. If I posted on SO it would get closed for not code.
May 5, 2016 at 16:52 comment added Robbie Dee @ErikEidt This sort of thing is useful for hand histories but again, not relevant for this calculation.
May 5, 2016 at 16:51 comment added Robbie Dee @KaspervandenBerg Whether they are all-in isn't relevant - the key thing is the committed chips for each player.
May 5, 2016 at 16:32 review Close votes
May 10, 2016 at 3:03
May 5, 2016 at 15:48 comment added paparazzo Looked it up an yes and an all in has claim to folded money only up to the amount they are all in.
May 5, 2016 at 15:44 answer added Robbie Dee timeline score: 1
May 5, 2016 at 15:36 comment added paparazzo The more I think about it I only need to know their total bet. If they are not folded then they are all in. First settle up that amount. The caveat there is that I am not sure from the rules of poker if an all in has a claim to folded money.
May 5, 2016 at 15:18 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
added 162 characters in body
May 5, 2016 at 14:49 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
added 220 characters in body
May 5, 2016 at 14:43 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
added 220 characters in body
May 5, 2016 at 14:39 comment added paparazzo @KaspervandenBerg Yes that was my thought. Looking for more detail and a chance someone had actually done this.
May 5, 2016 at 14:36 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
added 220 characters in body
May 5, 2016 at 14:36 comment added Erik Eidt To add to @KaspervandenBerg's comment, in business applications, one approach to persistence is called Event Sourcing. The idea is that instead of trying to maintain the current state from change requests, which are discarded after applied, instead the change requests are directly persisted in an events stream such as an append-only log. There are some practical advantages of this (especially when it comes to restarting a failed process), and it looks a bit like what you might need.
May 5, 2016 at 14:28 comment added Kasper van den Berg You can store the bets, who made them, and whether they went all in when the players make the bets. Preserve this data until the game is decided. And then distribute the pot according to the rules. So not having the information until the game is decided does not have to be a problem.
May 5, 2016 at 14:20 history edited paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0
added 64 characters in body
May 5, 2016 at 14:09 history asked paparazzo CC BY-SA 3.0