Timeline for How important is documentation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2017 at 23:22 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 15, 2017 at 3:04 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2016 at 4:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/809624078189559808 | ||
| Dec 8, 2016 at 23:09 | comment | added | user188153 | The question is: is the documentation made from code or the code from a documentation? It should be the latter, but in practice it's the first. That's why documentation always sucks. | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:38 | comment | added | JeffO | What documentation do you leave behind as you go from one project to the next? | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:37 | comment | added | JeffO | What do you put in this document you create? You would then have a more specific question(s) about why this isn't typically done. If one programmer can come out of the cold and write meaningful documentation in a few days, it seems that most projects had enough slack time for someone who was on the project to create. Nothing against you, but I'd think they could have created it in less time since they should know more about the project. | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 16:30 | answer | added | jpc | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 16:03 | vote | accept | SpaceCowboy | ||
| Dec 8, 2016 at 16:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 16, 2016 at 3:04 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2016 at 15:57 | answer | added | Robert Harvey | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 15:55 | answer | added | Nick Keighley | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 15:46 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 13:08 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2016 at 15:44 | history | asked | SpaceCowboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |